Skip to main content

MAX completely MAXed out

Ever since the crash of Ethiopian Airlines flight ET302, there has been a huge furore over the Boeing 737 MAX. With calls from all quarters to ground the aircraft, it was only a matter of time before the 737 MAX was completely stopped from flying.

                                                      Debris from the JT610 Crash

WHAT LED TO THE GROUNDING OF THE MAX?

Two completely fatal crashes brought the prospects of the aircraft crashing down. On 29th October 2018, Lion Air flight number JT610 crashed 12 minutes after takeoff, killing all 189 on board. Most recently, Ethiopian Airlines flight ET302 crashed 6 minutes after takeoff, killing all 157 on board. Due to possible safety issues, all governing bodies for aviation across the world have grounded the aircraft.

                                                               Crash site of ET302

WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE MAX?

All fingers point to the MCAS system on the 737 MAX. MCAS stands for Maneuver Characteristics Augmentation system and is a standard fixture on the MAX aircraft. It is used to prevent stall during low speed, nose up flight. The engines on the 737 MAX are installed higher and further forward compared to other 737 models. This placement caused an upward pitching movement. To pass certain certifications, Boeing installed the MCAS to counter the upward pitching movement. The MCAS automatically applies downward trim during steep turns, or when the angle of attack exceeds a certain limit. In the latter case, MCAS engages without notifying the pilot. This could well be the reason for the crashes.

HOW DOES THIS AFFECT BOEING?

At a time when demand for narrow body planes is increasing, this is the worst thing that could happen to Boeing. The optics of these events could have a damning effect on them, possibly ruining the 737's reputation for reliability for the forseeable future. Boeing's stock has crashed, wiping off almost $28 Billion worth of the value from the company. They will possibly have to pay a princely sum as compensation to 737 MAX operators across the world. With Garuda Indonesia mulling the cancellation of their order of 50 MAX aircraft, these might just be the beginning of Boeing's woes. With flyers actively avoiding the aircraft in question, it will be hard to predict as to when pax will be comfortable flying the MAX again.

INDIA'S REACTION TO THIS -

                                                                  SpiceJet B737 MAX

Day before yesterday, the DGCA with great reluctance decided to ground the MAX and has denied it overflight permission as well. India has 2 MAX operators - Jet Airways and SpiceJet. As we know, Jet's aircraft are grounded due to non payment of dues to lessors. Meanwhile SpiceJet has grounded all 12 of their MAX aircraft after flying as many pax as possible even though they were past the deadline immediately. This has led to cancellation of about 30 flights a day for them. I admire the government's grit to take a decision which would affect one 'Spicy' airline, which is their favourite ;)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CORSIA - Its implications

  Sustainability- it’s the latest buzzword around the world and more so in aviation. With the rollout of  CORSIA(Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation), we now have a new yardstick with respect to sustainability in aviation. The SARP(s)(Standards and Recommended Practices) mentioned under CORSIA is potentially risky for aircraft lessors and financiers. Several hundreds of aircraft operators will soon be forced to comply with the aforementioned scheme. Those operators which have more than 10,000 metric tons of CO2 will have to record and report emissions data on a yearly basis. Operators were also made to submit an emissions monitoring plan. The reported data will then be used to calculate the compliance requirements in the upcoming years. This makes things incredibly tricky for operators, who need to be well into their planning with respect to emission monitoring plans CORSIA consequently creates a number of credit and reputational risks for airlines and con

777X - The White Elephant in the room

Let’s not make any bones about it, Boeing has had a rough 2019, and their year from hell just seems to be getting worse. The 777X, successor to the much exalted 777-300/200 series is facing roadblock after roadblock. The legendary GE90 powered the older generation of the 777 series while the GE 9X will power the 777X. The GE9X will be the largest turbofan engine ever built, by far. Issues have cropped up with the engine’s durability due to high exhaust temperatures. Certification is turning into a nightmare for GE, in turn affecting Boeing. Most recently, one of their cargo doors exploded outwards during the final phases of load testing. In this test, the wings are made to flex much much more than it would ever flex during a routine commercial flight. While the plane withstood all the forces and depressurisation, the cargo door gave way in the last minute, thus putting another spoke in the wheel. While this is not a very major issue, it is definitely a setback for Boeing and will lea

A sneak peek into the performance of some airlines at BLR

While most avgeeks have a general idea of how an airline is faring from a certain airport, it is very rare that we get to see specific numbers of Passenger Load Factor and cargo tonnage. In this blog, I will put out a few numbers for certain airlines operating out of BLR. This will give us a fairly decent estimate of how well these airlines are doing. While we need the yield to numbers to perfectly ascertain the performance of an airline on a certain sector, we will discuss PLFs and cargo tonnage while assuming that yields are above average. Let's go ahead and check out some numbers now! (All mentioned numbers are for May 2019) 1. British Airways - Historically, BLR has been a good market for BA. At one point in time, they even used to fly their 747-400s to BLR. While they seem to have taken the sector for granted by sending their rickety old 777-200ER, that doesn't seem to have affected passenger numbers. Average arrival PLF - 85% Average departure PLF - 94.88%