Skip to main content

777X - The White Elephant in the room

Let’s not make any bones about it, Boeing has had a rough 2019, and their year from hell just seems to be getting worse. The 777X, successor to the much exalted 777-300/200 series is facing roadblock after roadblock. The legendary GE90 powered the older generation of the 777 series while the GE 9X will power the 777X. The GE9X will be the largest turbofan engine ever built, by far. Issues have cropped up with the engine’s durability due to high exhaust temperatures. Certification is turning into a nightmare for GE, in turn affecting Boeing. Most recently, one of their cargo doors exploded outwards during the final phases of load testing. In this test, the wings are made to flex much much more than it would ever flex during a routine commercial flight. While the plane withstood all the forces and depressurisation, the cargo door gave way in the last minute, thus putting another spoke in the wheel. While this is not a very major issue, it is definitely a setback for Boeing and will lead to an eventual delay in certification as well. While the development costs of the 777X are turning out to be much higher than anticipated, Boeing would not be too perturbed for now at least. This is due to the large number of orders that the 777X has secured.

THE FOLDING WINGTIP OF EMIRATES' 777X 
GE has redesigned the entire compressor of the GE9X engine in their endeavour to make the stator vanes more durable and robust. Amidst all this hubub, the launch customer of the 777X - Emirates is not very happy with the developments. They are even mulling a reduction of their order. Emirates is one their largest and most valued customers. On the other hand, they could lose out to Airbus in the much anticipated ‘Project Sunrise’ contest by Qantas. Boeing said that they would offer the 777-9X to Qantas, but that can happen only if they get it certified in time. To add insult to Boeing’s injury, the A350 series has been doing phenomenally well, stealing passengers’ hearts and Boeing’s customers across the world.


THE GE9X ON THE 747-400 TEST BED
Is the 777X program facing far too much scrutiny due to the 737MAX problems? It could well be the case. Alarmist and sensationalist reportage by publications and newschannels are just adding fuel to the fire. WSJ ran an elaborate report on how Boeing is developing a culture of cutting corners. Bloomberg went so far that they blamed the MCAS malfunctions on Indian companies, to whom part of the work was outsourced. Boeing’s Charleston factory is already infamous for its shoddy work, with some of their customers refusing to take planes that are built at the facility. All this brings one thing into focus - Trust. Surely, the trust that Boeing used to enjoy with customers and passengers is eroding. A problem like this could threaten the very existence of the company in the long run. All we can hope for is that Boeing will recover from this setback and bring back the glorious days of spirited competition between aircraft manufacturers, which will in turn benefit airlines and passengers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CORSIA - Its implications

  Sustainability- it’s the latest buzzword around the world and more so in aviation. With the rollout of  CORSIA(Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation), we now have a new yardstick with respect to sustainability in aviation. The SARP(s)(Standards and Recommended Practices) mentioned under CORSIA is potentially risky for aircraft lessors and financiers. Several hundreds of aircraft operators will soon be forced to comply with the aforementioned scheme. Those operators which have more than 10,000 metric tons of CO2 will have to record and report emissions data on a yearly basis. Operators were also made to submit an emissions monitoring plan. The reported data will then be used to calculate the compliance requirements in the upcoming years. This makes things incredibly tricky for operators, who need to be well into their planning with respect to emission monitoring plans CORSIA consequently creates a number of credit and reputational risks for airlines and con

A sneak peek into the performance of some airlines at BLR

While most avgeeks have a general idea of how an airline is faring from a certain airport, it is very rare that we get to see specific numbers of Passenger Load Factor and cargo tonnage. In this blog, I will put out a few numbers for certain airlines operating out of BLR. This will give us a fairly decent estimate of how well these airlines are doing. While we need the yield to numbers to perfectly ascertain the performance of an airline on a certain sector, we will discuss PLFs and cargo tonnage while assuming that yields are above average. Let's go ahead and check out some numbers now! (All mentioned numbers are for May 2019) 1. British Airways - Historically, BLR has been a good market for BA. At one point in time, they even used to fly their 747-400s to BLR. While they seem to have taken the sector for granted by sending their rickety old 777-200ER, that doesn't seem to have affected passenger numbers. Average arrival PLF - 85% Average departure PLF - 94.88%